| They are still at it.
What's amazing to me is many people are sucked into their premise
without any consideration for their purpose. This group is Anti-American and Communistic in its philosophy and we should call them what
they are, a danger to the American way of life.
Organic Farming...sounds so nice, so wonderful,
so idealistic, so great...but for whom? What would be the impact
if the United States went to all organic farming as EWG wants? Let's take a
look by asking the right questions and then looking at the real goals of the
EWG taken directly from them.
Do you think prices will
stay where they are in the food chain of this country if American
agriculture goes to organic production? Have you considered the
impact on the prices of your food? Do you think the supply
will be there if we take away years of technical advances in
agricultural production? Think of the last time you walked
down the isle of the grocery store and then ask your self, could we have
all of this if farmed organically in this country? That is what the Environmental Working
Group wants. America to switch to nothing but organic
farming. If you are a consumer of the rich bounty
of this country, beware. Your food source is being attacked by this un-American
group.
Let me start by saying without reservations, the Environmental Working
Group (EWG) is as un-American as they come. If you believe in
social government, you will like this organization. In other
words, EWG has goals that will take the US towards a socialist
type of Agriculture. It's all over their website if one will
just take the time to read it.
I love the phrase "what's down in the well
comes up in the bucket". Let me start by taking just a few quotes
from their website so you can see what's in their well. Again just
a few, I could use 100 pages if you had the time to read it.
Since they put out their garbage by state, I
used Texas for this presentation. What is underlined below is cut
and pasted directly from their website.
"Since organic food is one of the
fastest growing segments in the U.S. food industry, Texas could create a
healthier food supply and farm economy by increasing organic
production." (By the way, they said that about every state
in the union.)
That doesn't sound
socialistic does it? Of coarse not, what is socialistic is the
practical result of such a naive goal.
In short, more farmers in Texas would receive more federal assistance if
farm policy were reformed to distribute funding through conservation and
economic development programs.
OK...Did I miss something here...Let's see, they want us to get
more payments now? What the heck is this! I thought they
were against government payments!! Oh they are unless .... let's
see....Oh I get it, "conservation and
economic development programs." Like what? Its here
just look a little further!!
Pesticide
use in Texas is 39 million pounds per year and nitrate use is 959,000
tons per year.
Ooooh...Sounds Scary doesn't it. Let's see
now, Texas is HOW BIG?? We are going to spread that out over, HOW
MANY ACRES?? Give me a break!!! Oh, here is one for my
friends in Iowa.
In Iowa, 88.5 percent of surveyed rivers and
streams and 77.2 percent of surveyed lakes have been classified as
impaired due to siltation and excessive ammonia and nutrients (I
corrected their spelling here...geezzz). Of this, agricultural
pollution causes 8.3 percent of impaired river miles and 33.7 percent of
impaired lake acres. In short, agriculture is one of the leading causes
of nonpoint source pollution in Iowa.
Boy, it's great to visit but
don't drink the water...I'd rather go to Mexico and drink their water
then Iowa!!
By the way, what does "impaired" mean anyway, and since when is silt pollution? I thought that was natural!!
Expanded Conservation Programs
Would Pay Iowa Farmers to Protect Drinking Water, Farm Land, Public
Health and Wildlife Habitat
Yep...sounds really good
doesn't it. Here is the problem. ORGANIC
FARMING DOESN'T WORK COMMERCIALLY!! PLAIN AND SIMPLE. IF IT
DID WE WOULD BE DOING IT ALREADY!!!
The average yield per acre
for corn in the United States is 133 bushels per acre. We achieve this
yield through the use of fertilizer and pesticides. There is no
way to organically farm 10 billion bushels of corn in the US. In
1997, 42,000 acres of corn were grown organically out of 77 million
acres. Come on!! Do you think all corn farmers is the
US are so stupid as to not move to the most profitable form of
production?
I was fascinated to spend
several hours cruising the Internet on organic farming. You should
do that especially the US government page. Here is the link for
you, but don't forget to come back and finish reading this.
USDA Organic Page
On this page there is a 28 page report on
organic farming and how it's growing. (Realistically it isn't.)
This report never, never, never, talks about yields, only acres.
Why is that? Because production levels drop drastically. In
fact, I couldn't find a site that boasted about even similar yields
compared to traditional farming. Organic farming exists because
there is a small demand for it by people who can't or don't want to eat
something that has had a chemical on it. (They do drink water and other
things though...go figure!!). Now don't get me wrong,
organic farming is just another way to farm but it has not been proven
safer by the USDA or any farming organization that is science based.
The fact is that the engine
of the food cycle in America is meat production. Corn is eaten by
cattle which are then eaten by you and me. Unless this country
wants to all become vegetarians, I suggest we look at the demand for
corn and make sure we can produce enough of it to feed this country.
EWG believes we can do all
these wonderful things and the prices will just stay where they are.
They are utopians in a make believe world who have somehow gotten the
ears of congress. Do you think prices will
stay where they are in the food chains of this country if American
agriculture goes to organic production? Do you think the supply
will be there if we take away years of technical advances in
agricultural production? The ramifications are disastrous.
Remember, cattle manure is used to fertilize organic farms. Of
coarse they will only produce 1/5th of the corn needed so cattle numbers
will drop accordingly. Now there is less fertilizer so now we have
even less organic farming and on and on
it goes. Not to mention the ecoli-bacteria that has been
found in organic production. Oh, I'm not supposed to tell you
about that.
My final point is this, I said at the
top that the EWG is a socialistic organization which makes it
un-American. I have already shown that their long term goal is to
take US Agriculture into organic farming. A plan that will not
work as the cost to you as a consumer will be incredible. How are
they socialistic? Consider their desire to limit all farm sizes.
Here is another one of their quotes.
For instance, between 1996 and 2000, the top 10
percent of recipients (17,254 recipients) in Texas received over 70
percent of federal farm subsidies flowing into the state, with an
average payment of over $240,000 per recipient. In contrast, the bottom
90 percent of recipients (157,005 recipients) in Texas only received 33
percent of farm subsidies, with an average payment of little over
$12,455.
A question please. Who
feeds America...the large farmer or the small one? Think about
this for a second. These payments are made to the farmers based
on production!! I want to be sure you get
this...ON PRODUCTION!!! If a farmer is getting large
payments, then he has a large amount of production. It is the
large farmers who provide 80% of what you eat. Do not miss this...80%
of what you have eaten is from the large farmers in this country. Why does EWG want
to hurt them? They are the ones, who under a free and democratic
society have built their large farming operations. EWG is on the
record that they want to go
over to the socialist way of doing things by making large farms small
and putting all farms on some organic production schedule. Have
you ever studied the communistic approach to agriculture? The EWG
sounds
just like the old USSR to me. I know you're saying I'm waving the communist
card here and you're dang right. Stop and think about it because
the logic is sound.
I think whoever is working
for these guys must have MBA degrees but they are not like mine.
Theirs stands for "Most Brains Absent".
The bottom line is this, it didn't work in the Soviet
Union and will not work here either. The ramifications of the goals of EWG will be disastrous.
It's time we stand against these socialists who use the tactic of
whining "they get more than you do" as a way to get unsuspecting people
to buy into their garbage.
You have a choice.
Don't get sucked into their socialism. These guys are slick...but
in the long term, I
hope all they have done is awaken a sleeping giant.
Dennis DeLaughter, CEO
Your comments are welcome...especially if
your on the other side. Maybe I can do you a great service by
helping you see the real truth! (I'm starting to sound like Rush
Limbaugh.)
support@progressivefutures.com
Futures and options trading
are speculative in nature and involve substantial risk of loss.
Futures trading is not appropriate for all investors. Past performance
is not indicative of future results.
|